Do You Think You Have a Case Against Bayer?

Feldman & Rifkin, LLP
is investigating cases against Bayer for the Baycol Recall.

Please fill out our
Short Evaluation Form

 

Company lawyer calls the mailing a mistake

By J.R. Gonzales Caller-Times
February 22, 2003

The Nueces County District Attorney's Office is looking into allegations that representatives of Bayer Pharmaceutical Co. engaged in jury tampering.

Bayer is involved in a civil trial in County Court-at-Law No. 4 over its withdrawn cholesterol drug Baycol. Hollis Haltom of Corpus Christi filed a lawsuit against the company after experiencing a breakdown in muscle tissue less than a month after he began taking the drug, according to the lawsuit.

Haltom's attorney, Mikal Watts, said he became concerned when he heard people on a local radio show Friday morning make comments regarding information listed in confidential medical records. Watts said some of the comments came word for word from a letter Bayer acknowledged it distributed in the area.

Bayer attorney Philip Beck said in an interview that the letter was a mistake on his client's part. He did not know of it until Thursday afternoon.

The letter from Meredith B. Fischer,vice president for Bayer HealthCare North America Communications and Public Policy, referred to the case and provided some background on Baycol.

"Over the next several weeks, there will undoubtedly be interest in the Corpus Christi community about a local man who is suing Bayer Corporation regarding a drug called Baycol, which was voluntarily withdrawn from the market in August in 2001," the letter dated Feb. 17 states.

"We're sorry that the letter went out," Beck said. "It's not going to disrupt the trial in any way."

Friday morning, Watts asked County Court-at-Law No. 4 Judge James Klager to forbid the company from engaging in jury tampering, according to court records. He also asked the judge to schedule a hearing that could levy sanctions against the defendants.

Klager signed an order prohibiting both parties from contacting jurors.

The allegations of jury tampering were filed in a motion after Bayer sent more than 2,000 letters to local residents this week, Watts said in an interview.

"As you hear and see reports of the trial, I hope that you will keep an open mind to the efforts that Bayer made to give fair redress to this gentleman" the letter also stated.

District Attorney Carlos Valdez said the recipients were pulled from a mailing list.

Some local attorneys and a prospective juror in the case, as well as others, received the letter.

Beck said the letter was sent out in response to pre-trial statements recently released by the Watts Law Firm.

Fischer and one of Bayer's attorneys have been subpoenaed regarding a post-trial sanction hearing, he said.

Valdez said his office would review the allegations. If they decide to pursue criminal charges, Fischer and others involved in creating the letter could face misdemeanor charges of coercion of a public servant or improper influence.

Since the allegations have surfaced, Beck said that he told company representatives not to make comments to the media regarding litigation.

After the judge heard the jury tampering motion, testimony continued Friday morning.

Go Back To News